![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Actual Refinery Amine Samples (feed, discharge, waste) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| See Additional Links: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Field Trial Results |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| A Tough Example of What SigmaPure Can Do |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Prequalification Laboratory Testing |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Three samples from different operating units in the same refinery |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Photomicrographs reveal the presence or absence of insoluble contaminants that affect foam stability. The dirtier samples above have the lowest foaming tendencies. The contaminants in the samples consist of solids, responsible for the green color, and insoluble hydrocarbon liquids (probably antifoam). These insoluble liquids cause haziness because they refractivity is different than the solution . The insoluble liquids are also agglomerating the solids, and destabilizing the foam. This is one way antifoam is exhausted in process. It can't interact with the froth cell walls if it's gluing solids together, or being removed by mechanical filters and activated carbon. In both cases shown above, there is either enough free insoluble liquid to inhibit foaming, or the concentration of surfactants is low. The photomicrographs of the middle sample suggest the former, where the latter is suggested for the sample on the right. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sample color and clarity do not accurately depict foaming tendency. Clean solutions are often more "foamy" than dirty ones. |